Understanding is thinking within a mold.
Phenomenology as non-logical steps
When we precisely understand its formed intricacy, that is just when we exceed its forms. When we don't understand a book, we can only quote it. To understand it is to dwell-think in its forms, and that is more precise than the forms.
(DeepL)If you cannot understand a book, you have to quote it. To understand it is to think within its form, which is more precise than the form.
nishio.iconTranslation: We need not surrender to "what is already structured. When we understand a complex structure accurately, that is the moment to go beyond that structure. When we read a book and do not understand it, we can only quote it. To understand a book is to dwell-think within its structure, which is a more accurate understanding than the written structure.
When you don't understand a book, all you can do is quote it.
I can only quote what I don't understand.
from Phenomenology as an illogical stage in Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning
When we understand exactly the complexity that has been formed, when it transcends its form
When you don't understand it, all you can do is quote it.
nishio.iconThat's me right now.
To understand is to be "in" the form "Housing - Thoughts".
This is a more accurate understanding than "keeping" the formality.
nishio.icon Shuhari I associate it with
When you don't understand type (e.g. of machine, goods, etc.) you can only defend [type (e.g. of machine, goods, etc.)
When understood accurately, the mold is broken.
The machine translation translated "form" as "shape" but changed it to "type.
Understood: Dwelling" and the Kozane Law.
Do you really understand?
How do we know if we "got it exactly right?"
2022-01-13
[In "Dwelling" and the Kozane Law
"By creating a pseudo "symbolic space for the other party" through the placement of sticky notes, we can "live" by working within that space.
To verify if this "understanding = hypothesis" is correct, we put it into practice and observed the results.
Specifically, I worked to transform Heidegger's "Building, Living, Thinking" into a space without distorting its symbols.
Kozaneba:dwell-think
The conclusion, in a word, is half right, half wrong with my representation.
The meaning of the word "live" was much more abstract than initially imagined.
This would be more interesting if it were firmly verbalized instead of just one word.
2022-01-17
Firmly verbalized: Building, Living, Thinking.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/理解とは型の中で考えること using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.